We are a group of like-minded landlords who have joined together to fight for fairness. We believe that LPA receivers have acted in an unjust and negligent way; jeopardising, and in some cases destroying, the hard earned livelihood of honest, committed landlords. If this sounds like you, help us to help you and together we can fight for fairness. We are calling for all landlords and tenants who have experiences with LPA receivers to get in touch with us. Share your story in the forum or get in contact.
The rule of the LPA Receiver must come to an end
In the blizzard of recession, collapse of banks, the tenancy deposit scheme and payments of housing benefits going directly to tenants, landlords have become victim to the unmerciful actions of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA) receivers. Appointed by mortgage lenders when borrowers default on loan repayments, LPA receivers effectively step into the role of the landlord; able to collect all rental income, remove tenants, place tenants and sell the property as and when- taking all the property's equity and cash flow with them.
Why do lenders appoint LPA receivers?
By appointing an external agency, the lender is able to have a degree of legal separation from the property so that the receiver takes the risk of liability on the lender's behalf. Lenders previously would have had to go to court to apply to the court for possession, which could take months. By appointing LPA receivers, rent can be collected immediately and the property sold at will. The neutrality of the relationship between lenders and LPA receivers has been questioned however- for example the head of credit and fraud at Bradford and Bingley, Mr Ray Hugill is now the director of Templeton LPA receivers.